A Program Evaluation of Behavioral Health Integration in a Freestanding Birth Center.

The objective of this evaluation was to evaluate the integration of behavioral health services at a freestanding birth center. Program evaluation included (1) retrospective health record reviews and (2) provider and client evaluation of satisfaction. In May 2017, an urban freestanding birth center initiated grant-funded integrated behavioral health services. Participants included women receiving perinatal care from May 2016 to April 2018 (n = 831). Clients (n = 414) and providers (n = 9) were surveyed through e-mail, with 166 (40%) and 7 (78%) responses, respectively. Depressive symptoms were measured with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Screening and treatment of depression were identified from health records. The on-site therapist saw 21% of women who birthed during the program's first year. Compared with the year before the program began, in the program's first year, more women were screened for depression at least once (401/415 (96.6%) vs 413/415 (99.5%), P = .002) and more women with an indication received treatment (62.5% [105/168] vs 34.5% [38/110], P < .001). Provider and client satisfaction was high. The on-site therapist provided services easily integrated into the freestanding birth center practice, resulting in increased depression screening and treatment, with overwhelming client and provider satisfaction.

Key indicators influencing management of prolonged second stage labour by midwives in freestanding birth centres: Results from an ethnographic interview study.

PROBLEMS: Complications for newborns and postpartum clients in the hospital are more frequent after a prolonged second stage of labour. Midwives in community settings have little research to guide management in their settings. AIM: We explored how US birth centre midwives identify onset of second stage of labour and determine when to transfer clients to the hospital for prolonged second stage. METHODS: Ethnographic interviews of midwives with at least 2 years' experience in birth centres and participant observation of birth centre care. FINDINGS: We interviewed 21 midwives (18 CNMs, 3 CPMs/equivalent) from 18 birth centres in 11 US states, 45% with hospital practice privileges. Midwives relied on and engaged in embodied practice in evaluating each labour and making decisions concerning management of labour. Midwives considered time a useful but limited measure as a guiding factor in management. Though ideas of time and progress do play an important role in the decision-making process of midwives, their usefulness is limited due to the continual, multifactorial, and multisensory nature of the assessment. Relationship with the transfer hospital structured midwives' decision-making about transfers. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: These findings can inform future robust multivariate evaluation of factors, including but not limited to time, in guidelines for management of second stage of labour. Optimal management may require formal consideration of more than just time and parity. Our findings also suggest the need for evaluation of how structural issues involving hospital privileges for midwives and relationships between birth centre and hospital staff affect the well-being of childbearing families.

Developing operational standards for Midwifery Centers.

BACKGROUND: Midwifery centres have been identified in over 56 countries. Consensus was reached on a global definition for midwifery centres, yet there is a lack of standards to assure consistent quality of care is provided. METHODS: Evidence-based standards and guidelines developed from American Association of Birth Centres (USA), Midwifery Unity Network (UK/EU), World Health Organization, International Childbirth Initiative, and White Ribbon Alliance, were gathered, duplicate standards were removed, and language was adapted for global use with sensitivity to low and middle countries (LMIC). An initial list of 52 midwifery centre standards were identified. Through an informal modified Delphi process these were reviewed by global midwifery centres experts, researchers, and midwifery centre staff at focus groups in Haiti, Mexico and Bangladesh for significance, language, and usability. The standards were then piloted at midwifery centres in eight countries (Sierra Leone, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Mexico, Haiti, Peru, Uganda and Trinidad). All feedback was incorporated into the final standards. RESULTS: A final list of 43 standards, organized into 3 domains including quality standards for care providers, dignity standards for women, and community standards for administration, were agreed on. CONCLUSION: Midwifery centres are prevalent around the globe. Identifying standards for quality of care provides a foundation for the midwifery centre model to be replicated and ensure consistent quality of care. Evidence based standards for midwifery centres in LMIC, allows systems to embrace and encourage the implementation and growth of midwifery centres to address accessible, acceptable, respectful, woman-centred, community-engaged maternal health care that participates fully in the health care system.

Rural resilience: The role of birth centers in the United States.

PURPOSE: To explore the role of the birth center model of care in rural health and maternity care delivery in the United States. METHODS: All childbearing families enrolled in care at an American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data RegistryTM user sites between 2012 and 2020 are included in this descriptive analysis. FINDINGS: Between 2012 and 2020, 88 574 childbearing families enrolled in care with 82 American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data RegistryTM user sites. Quality outcomes exceeded national benchmarks across all geographic regions in both rural and urban settings. A stable and predictable rate of transfer to a higher level of care was demonstrated across geographic regions, with over half of the population remaining appropriate for birth center level of care throughout the perinatal episode of care. Controlling for socio demographic and medical risk factors, outcomes were as favorable for clients in rural areas compared with urban and suburban communities. CONCLUSIONS: Rural populations cared for within the birth center model of care experienced high-quality outcomes. HEALTH POLICY IMPLICATIONS: A major focus of the United States maternity care reform should be the expansion of access to birth center models of care, especially in underserved areas such as rural communities.

[Opening Status of the Korea Midwifery Birthing Centers and Development of Midwifery Practice Guideline].

PURPOSE: This study was to investigate the operational status of the midwifery birthing centers (MBCs) and midwives' job status (Phase 1) and to develop midwifery practice guidelines (MPG) (Phase 2) in Korea. METHODS: In the first phase, the subjects were 15 midwives who operated 11 of 14 MBCs that were opened as of August 2018. The questionnaire consisted of items to measure the operational status of the MBC and midwives' job status. In the second phase, the MPG was developed from literature review, interviews with five midwives opening their MBCs, surveys with 74 midwives, and a validity evaluation conducted by seven experts. RESULTS: The distribution of operating MBCs was five in Gyunggi-do, two each in Seoul and Incheon, one each in Busan, Chungcheongbuk-do, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Gyeongsangnam-do and Jeju-do. The mean age of midwives was 54.3 and all were female. In 2017, a total of 762 births including 81 homebirths were performed by midwives. The job performance was highest in the order of neonatal care 3.81, childbirth care 3.56, and postpartal care 3.53, respectively. The MPG included seven areas of prenatal care, childbirth care, postpartal care, neonatal care, primary health care, law/ethics, and administration, with 56 tasks and 166 task elements. CONCLUSION: This study provides the valid basic data for the operational status of the MBC and the midwives' job status. The MPG describes the midwife's job and may be used as basic data for preparing policies for the development of midwifery practice in Korea.

Identified themes of interactive visualizations overlayed onto EHR data: an example of improving birth center operating room efficiency.

OBJECTIVE: While electronic health record (EHR) systems store copious amounts of patient data, aggregating those data across patients can be challenging. Visual analytic tools that integrate with EHR systems allow clinicians to gain better insight and understanding into clinical care and management. We report on our experience building Tableau-based visualizations and integrating them into our EHR system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Visual analytic tools were created as part of 12 clinician-initiated quality improvement projects. We built the visual analytic tools in Tableau and linked it within our EPIC environment. We identified 5 visual themes that spanned the various projects. To illustrate these themes, we choose 1 exemplary project which aimed to improve obstetric operating room efficiency. RESULTS: Across our 12 projects, we identified 5 visual themes that are integral to project success: scheduling & optimization (in 11/12 projects); provider assessment (10/12); executive assessment (8/12); patient outcomes (7/12); and control and goal charts (2/12). DISCUSSION: Many visualizations share common themes. Identification of these themes has allowed our internal team to be more efficient and directed in developing visualizations for future projects. CONCLUSION: Organizing visual analytics into themes can allow informatics teams to more efficiently provide visual products to clinical collaborators.

Women's experiences of antenatal transfer for threatened premature labour in NSW: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Each year thousands of pregnant women experiencing threatened premature labour are transferred considerable distances across Australia to access higher level facilities but only a small proportion of these women go on to actually give birth to a premature baby. Women from regional areas are required to move away from their home, children and support networks because of a perceived risk of birthing in a centre without neonatal intensive care facilities. AIM: This study examines the experience of women undergoing antenatal transfer for threatened premature labour in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory who do not give birth during their transfer admission. METHODS: Thirteen semi-structured in-depth interviews were held with women across five tertiary referral sites across New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory, and analysed until saturation for themes. FINDINGS: Seven urban and six rural women were interviewed. Women and their families were all negatively affected by antenatal transfer. Factors that helped enable a positive experience were; enhanced sense of safety in the tertiary unit, and individual qualities of staff. Factors that contributed to negative experiences were; inadequate and conflicting information, and no involvement or choice in the clinical decision-making process to move to another facility. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal transfer is an extremely stressful experience for women and their families. The provision of high quality written and verbal information, and the inclusion of women's perception of risk in the clinical decision making process will improve the experience for women and their families in NSW and the ACT.

Roots Community Birth Center: A culturally-centered care model for improving value and equity in childbirth.

Pernicious racial disparities in birth outcomes in the United States have their roots in structural racism-the systematic allocation of opportunities and resources based on race. These inequities, caused by systemic factors which contribute to lower quality of care, negatively impact the lives of Blacks/African Americans. The development of new maternity care models hold potential to reduce disparities and costs by focusing on the root cause of racism. Roots Community Birth Center is an African American-owned, midwife-led freestanding birth center in North Minneapolis. Roots provides a culturally-centered model of care during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period. The culturally-centered care model utilized by Roots Community Birth Center offers culturally-centered care that is community based, accepts Medicaid beneficiaries, and provides prenatal and postpartum visits that are customized to the needs of the birthing individual. Like other institutions, this birth center faces the financial challenges associated with maternity care payment models and inadequate Medicaid reimbursement, challenges that directly interfere with the center's culturally-centered care model which advocates for longer prenatal visits and close follow-up postpartum. The birth center model of care has proven effective; over the last four years Roots has had 284 families with zero preterm births. The culturally-centered care model used by Roots is not currently well-supported by maternity care payment models that were designed in large part to reflect typical care provided by obstetricians and hospitals.

An analysis of media reporting on the closure of freestanding midwifery units in England.

PROBLEM: Despite clinical guidelines and policy promoting choice of place of birth, 14 Freestanding Midwifery Units were closed between 2008 and 2015, closures reported in the media as justified by low use and financial constraints. BACKGROUND: The Birthplace in England Programme found that freestanding midwifery units provided the most cost-effective birthplace for women at low risk of complications. Women planning birth in a freestanding unit were less likely to experience interventions and serious morbidity than those planning obstetric unit birth, with no difference in outcomes for babies. METHODS: This paper uses an interpretative technique developed for policy analysis to explore the representation of these closures in 191 news articles, to explore the public climate in which they occurred. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: The articles focussed on underuse by women and financial constraints on services. Despite the inclusion of service user voices, the power of framing was held by service managers and commissioners. The analysis exposed how neoliberalist and austerity policies have privileged representation of individual consumer choice and market-driven provision as drivers of changes in health services. This normative framing presents the reasons given for closure as hard to refute and cultural norms persist that birth is safest in an obstetric setting, despite evidence to the contrary. CONCLUSION: The rise of neoliberalism and austerity in contemporary Britain has influenced the reform of maternity services, in particular the closure of midwifery units. Justifications given for closure silence other narratives, predominantly from service users, that attempt to present women's choice in terms of rights and a social model of care.

The Availability of Emergency Obstetric Care in Birthing Centres in Rural Nepal: A Cross-sectional Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this health system's study is to assess the availability of Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) services in birthing centres in Taplejung District of eastern Nepal. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2018 in all 16 public health facilities providing delivery services in the district. Data collection comprised: (1) quantitative data collected from health workers; (2) observation of key items; and (3) record data extracted from the health facility register. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate readiness scores using unweighted averages. RESULTS: Although key health personnel were available, EmOC services at the health facilities assessed were below the minimum coverage level recommended by the World Health Organisation. Only the district hospital provided the nine signal functions of Comprehensive EmOC. The other fifteen had only partially functioning Basic EmOC facilities, as they did not provide all of the seven signal functions. The essential equipment for performing certain EmOC functions was either missing or not functional in these health facilities. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: The Ministry of Health and Population and the federal government need to ensure that the full range of signal functions are available for safe deliveries in partially functioning EmOC health facilities by addressing the issues related to training, equipment, medicine, commodities and policy.

Applying best practices to pregnant women in the obstetric center.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the meaning attributed by nursing technicians to good care practices based on scientific evidence used with the pregnant women during the dilation stage of labor. METHOD: A qualitative study, based on Grounded Theory principles. Twelve interviews with nursing technicians attending labor in the obstetric center of two public hospitals, in Florianópolis/SC, were performed, from August of 2016 to March of 2017. Data were analyzed using open, axial coding. RESULTS: The implementation of good practices, for nursing technicians, means adequately performing their activities, providing humanized care to the pregnant woman, respecting her autonomy, promoting pain relief, and a peaceful labor. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: An adequate number of technicians must be determined to maintain quality of care, and to complete nursing records in a more detailed and systematized manner.

Factors associated with low Apgar in newborns in birth center.

OBJECTIVE: to analyze factors associated with Apgar of 5 minutes less than 7 of newborns of women selected for care at the Center for Normal Birth (ANC). METHOD: a descriptive cross-sectional study with data from 9,135 newborns collected between July 2001 and December 2012. The analysis used absolute and relative frequency frequencies and bivariate analysis using Pearson's chi-square test or the exact Fisher. RESULTS: fifty-three newborns (0.6%) had Apgar less than 7 in the 5th minute. The multivariate analysis found a positive association between low Apgar and gestational age less than 37 weeks, gestational pathologies and intercurrences in labor. The presence of the companion was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: the Normal Birth Center is a viable option for newborns of low risk women as long as the protocol for screening low-risk women is followed.

Alcance de la implementación en Cataluña de las estrategias de salud reproductiva (2008-2017) / The extent of the implementation of reproductive health strategies in Catalonia (Spain) (2008-2017)

Objetivo: Analizar la implementación de las estrategias de salud reproductiva en las actividades cotidianas de los servicios y la transformación de las prácticas de profesionales y usuarias. Método: Investigación cartográfica de tipo etnográfico multilocal orientada a captar los procesos de transformación. Técnicas de generación de datos: observación participante y entrevistas situadas. Análisis del discurso del corpus textual a partir de tres líneas de acción promovidas por las estrategias. Resultados: Se observan elementos de transformación en: 1) desmedicalización: aumento de la competencia y autonomía de la matrona, cambios en las episiotomías y facilitación de prácticas de vínculo; 2) calidez en la atención: incorporación de las necesidades y expectativas de la mujer y mejoras en la confortabilidad de los espacios en partos fisiológicos; y 3) participación: acciones que favorecen la toma de decisiones compartida y mayor implicación de la persona acompañante. Conclusiones: La transformación se visibiliza sobre todo en la incorporación de nuevas actitudes, nuevas sensibilidades y nuevas praxis que empiezan alrededor de las viejas estructuras, especialmente en la atención al parto fisiológico. Los espacios más tecnificados han sido menos permeables al cambio. La gestión del riesgo en la toma de decisiones y el abordaje de la diversidad se identifican como campos en los que la transformación es menos evidente

Objective: We analyse how reproductive health strategies have been incorporated into the everyday activities of the services and the resulting transformation of professional and user practices. Method: Cartographic research taking a multi-sited ethnographic approach that seeks to reveal the processes of transformation. Data generation techniques featuring participant observation and situated interviews. Discourse analysis of the text corpus using three analytical axes based on three main lines of action promoted by the strategies. Results: We identified transformations in: 1) demedicalisation: an increase in midwives' know-how and autonomy, changes in episiotomy practice and the facilitation of bonding practices; 2) warmth of care: incorporation of women's needs and expectations and improvements in the comfortableness of birth settings, especially in assistance at physiological birth; and 3) participation: actions that foster shared decision-making and the involvement of the persons accompanying women in labour. Conclusions: Above all, transformation is visible in the incorporation of new attitudes, sensibilities and practices that have developed around the old structures, especially during physiological childbirth. The more technological areas have been less permeable to change. Risk management in decision-making and addressing diversity are identified as areas where transformation is less evident

Social Determinants of Health and their influence on the choice of birth control methods.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the association between Social Determinants of Health and birth control methods used by women of childbearing age. METHODS: Documentary and retrospective study, performed at a Brazilian Natural Birth Center with evaluation of the medical records of patients seen between 2003 and 2011 (n=2410). Data were collected on identification and general history, gynecological, sexual and obstetric. RESULTS: Hormone birth control methods were the most used among participants (25.0%); followed by barrier methods (21.5%) and surgical methods (19.3%). Statistical associations were observed regarding age, menarche, onset of sexual activity, pregnancy, miscarriage, smoking, hypertension, marital status, gynecological care and schooling with the choice of methods. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the importance of studies involving Social Determinants of Health, since they interfere in the way women choose birth control methods and the risks that this choice may pose to their health.

Social Determinants of Health and their influence on the choice of birth control methods / Determinantes Sociales de la Salud y su influencia en la elección del método anticonceptivo / Determinantes Sociais da Saúde e sua influência na escolha do método contraceptivo

ABSTRACT Objective: To verify the association between Social Determinants of Health and birth control methods used by women of childbearing age. Methods: Documentary and retrospective study, performed at a Brazilian Natural Birth Center with evaluation of the medical records of patients seen between 2003 and 2011 (n=2410). Data were collected on identification and general history, gynecological, sexual and obstetric. Results: Hormone birth control methods were the most used among participants (25.0%); followed by barrier methods (21.5%) and surgical methods (19.3%). Statistical associations were observed regarding age, menarche, onset of sexual activity, pregnancy, miscarriage, smoking, hypertension, marital status, gynecological care and schooling with the choice of methods. Conclusion: The results confirm the importance of studies involving Social Determinants of Health, since they interfere in the way women choose birth control methods and the risks that this choice may pose to their health.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Verificar la asociación entre los Determinantes Sociales de la Salud y el método anticonceptivo utilizado por mujeres en edad fértil. Métodos: Estudio documental y retrospectivo, realizado en un Centro de Parto Natural con evaluación de los prontuarios de pacientes atendidos entre 2003 y 2011 (n=2410). Se recogieron datos de identificación e histórico general, ginecológico, sexual y obstétrico. Resultados: Se destacaron los métodos hormonales como los más utilizados entre las participantes de la investigación (25,0%), seguido por los métodos de barrera (21,5%) y por los métodos quirúrgicos (19,3%). Se observaron asociaciones estadísticas sobre edad, menarquia, inicio de la vida sexual, embarazo, aborto, tabaquismo, hipertensión, estado civil, cuidado ginecológico y escolaridad con la elección de los métodos. Conclusión: Los resultados ratifican la importancia de estudios que involucran a los Determinantes Sociales de la Salud, Determinantes Sociales de la Salud que interfieren en la forma en que las mujeres escogen los métodos anticonceptivos y los riesgos que esa elección puede suponer para su salud.

RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar a associação entre os Determinantes Sociais da Saúde e o método contraceptivo utilizado por mulheres em idade fértil. Métodos: Estudo documental e retrospectivo, realizado em um Centro de Parto Natural com avaliação dos prontuários de pacientes atendidas entre 2003 e 2011 (n=2410). Foram coletados dados de identificação e histórico geral, ginecológico, sexual e obstétrico. Resultados: Destacaram-se os métodos hormonais como os mais utilizados entre as participantes da pesquisa (25,0%), seguido pelos métodos de barreira (21,5%) e pelos métodos cirúrgicos (19,3%). Foram observadas associações estatísticas acerca da idade, menarca, início da vida sexual, gravidez, aborto, tabagismo, hipertensão, estado civil, cuidado ginecológico e escolaridade com a escolha dos métodos. Conclusão: Os resultados ratificam a importância de estudos envolvendo os Determinantes Sociais da Saúde, visto que interferem na forma como as mulheres escolhem os métodos contraceptivos e os riscos que essa escolha pode representar para a sua saúde.

Barriers to women's access to alongside midwifery units in England.

BACKGROUND: Alongside midwifery units (AMUs) are managed by midwives and proximate to obstetric units (OUs), offering a home-like birth environment for women with straightforward pregnancies. They support physiological birth, with fast access to medical care if needed. AMUs have good perinatal outcomes and lower rates of interventions than OUs. In England, uptake remains lower than potential use, despite recent changes in policy to support their use. This article reports on experiences of access from a broader study that investigated AMU organisation and care. METHODS: Organisational case studies in four National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected for variation geographically and in features of their midwifery units. Fieldwork (December 2011 to October 2012) included observations (>100 h); semi-structured interviews with staff, managers and stakeholders (n = 89) and with postnatal women and partners (n = 47), on which this paper reports. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo10 software. RESULTS: Women, partners and families felt welcome and valued in the AMU. They were drawn to the AMUs' environment, philosophy and approach to technology, including pain management. Access for some was hindered by inconsistent information about the existence, environment and safety of AMUs, and barriers to admission in early labour. CONCLUSIONS: Key barriers to AMUs arise through inequitable information and challenges with admission in early labour. Most women still give birth in obstetric units and despite increases in the numbers of women birthing on AMUs since 2010, addressing these barriers will be essential to future scale-up.

Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.

BACKGROUND: A recent Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation report evaluated the four-year Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns Initiative, which sought to improve maternal and newborn outcomes through exploration of three enhanced, evidence-based care models. This paper reports the socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns engaged in care with American Association of Birth Centers (AABC) sites. METHODS: The authors examined data for 6424 Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) beneficiaries in birth center care who gave birth between 2013 and 2017. Using data from the AABC Perinatal Data Registry™, descriptive statistics were used to evaluate socio-behavioral and medical risks, and core perinatal quality outcomes. Comparisons are made between outcomes in the AABC sample and national data during the study period. RESULTS: Childbearing mothers enrolled at AABC sites had diverse socio-behavioral risk factors similar to the national profile. The AABC sites exceeded national quality benchmarks for low birthweight (3.28%), preterm birth (4.42%), and primary cesarean birth (8.56%). Racial disparities in perinatal indicators were present within the Strong Start sample; however, they were at narrower margins than in national data. The enhanced model of care was notable for use of midwifery-led prenatal, labor, and birth care and decreased hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: Birth center care improves population health, patient experience, and value. The model demonstrates the potential to decrease racial disparity and improve population health. Reduction of regulatory barriers and implementation of sustainable reimbursement are warranted to move the model to scale for Medicaid beneficiaries nationwide.

Home and Birth Center Birth in the United States: Time for Greater Collaboration Across Models of Care.

There has been a small, but significant, increase in community births (home and birth-center births) in the United States in recent years. The rate increased by 20% from 2004 to 2008, and another 59% from 2008 to 2012, though the overall rate is still low at less than 2%. Although the United States is not the only country with a large majority of births occurring in the hospital, there are other high-resource countries where home and birth-center birth are far more common and where community midwives (those attending births at home and in birth centers) are far more central to the provision of care. In many such countries, the differences in perinatal outcomes between hospital and community births are small, and there are lower rates of maternal morbidity in the community setting. In the United States, perinatal mortality appears to be higher for community births, though there has yet to be a national study comparing outcomes across settings that controls for planned place of birth. Rates of intervention, including cesarean delivery, are significantly higher in hospital births in the United States. Compared with the United States, countries that have higher rates of community births have better integrated systems with clearer national guidelines governing risk criteria and planned birth location, as well as transfer to higher levels of care. Differences in outcomes, systems, approaches, and client motivations are important to understand, because they are critical to the processes of person-centered care and to risk reduction across all birth settings.